Should genitically modified foods be labeled Research Paper

Should genitically special foods be labeled - inquiry Paper ExampleActually, a lot of food that we eat today contains genetically modified ingredients. Supporters of this applied acquirement claim that it expediencys humanity because that it meets and sustains food security around the world as the population increases. Genetic applied science (GE) or Genetic Modification (GM) of food is an issue that has entered the mainstream media in a lot of countries. It is a circumstance that a lot of food that we eat today contains genetically modified ingredients and usually without our have a go at itledge. Supporters of this engineering science give that it ensures and sustains food security around the world as the population increases (Caplan). There is no doubt that the science behind genetic engineering is improving. While biotechnology could be the wave of the future and genetically modified foods could really provide alternatives to help increase food production, there is a gr owing wave of come to from citizens, farmers and scientists who question the way the research is circulating(prenominal)ly being handled by a few large, profit-hungry corporations. That is, as intimately as scientific debates on the merits of genetically engineered food, there are equally, if not more important, debates on the electromotive force danger on both human beings and the environment (Kass). Much of the concern people have somewhat Genetic Engineering is due to the fact that it is a very young and untested technology and whitethorn not be the answer to the food shortage problem just yet. Similarly, curb uniformity, which the biotech firms are promoting, result reduce genetic diversity making them more vulnerable to disease and pests. This furthers the need for pesticides, which are created by the same companies creating and promoting genetically engineered crops. This leads to questions of the motives of corporations and countries who are using the plight of the dev eloping world as a selling strategy to gain acceptance of GE food as well as dependency upon it via adroit property rights. That they are against any labeling or other precautionary steps and measures that countries whitethorn wish to bring is of paramount concern. The reason that genetically engineered food could be dangerous is due to the lack of testing to ensure that extracting genes that perform an apparently useful function as part of that plant or animal is liberation to have the same effects if inserted into a totally unrelated species. It may be that in the colossal term, genetically modified food could provide us with benefits and be a safe alternative, but we cannot know that at this time due to the lack of safety testing. The testing that has been done is often to ensure that the crop grows. Yet, there has been less emphasis on testing the effects or testing the wider ecology and the associated impacts of this technology on humans and nature. Even if there has been some testing, the long-term effects to humans, animals and the environment are unknown. The safe ramifications of modified genes mixing with unmodified ones are unknown (Caplan). Thus, genetically modified food may benefit us, but we cannot know that at this time because much needed testing has not been done and current studies point to dangers rather than benefits. However, a group of scientists in UK do claim that GE food may be safe, but they mention that the long-term effects are still unknown. Also, it should be noted that a lot of field tests that companies do